Fimo

Compare Fimo: Three categories, one question: who runs the site after launch?

Contentful
vs Fimo
Cursor
vs Fimo
Framer
vs Fimo
Lovable
vs Fimo
Replit
vs Fimo
Storyblok
vs Fimo
Webflow
vs Fimo

A headless CMS stores the content. A coding agent writes the code. A builder hosts the site. After launch, all three wait for someone to come back. Pick the one you are coming from.

headless cms

A CMS that also has the site's code.

A headless CMS stores your content and stops there. Fimo stores it the same way, and also has the site's code: it hosts the site, previews changes before they go live and runs agents on it.

Contentful vs FimoStoryblok vs Fimo
coding agents

They build the site. Something has to run it.

Claude Code, Cursor and Codex write the code, then wait for the next prompt. Fimo takes the site from there: a CMS over its content, hosting with a preview per branch, and agents on a schedule.

Cursor vs Fimo
website builders

Your code, not their platform.

A builder keeps the site inside its platform, canvas and runtime included. Fimo works on the site's code itself: real framework code you and your coding agent can optimize freely, and take anywhere.

Framer vs FimoLovable vs FimoReplit vs FimoWebflow vs Fimo

Fimo is not the tool that builds your website. It is the one that runs it afterwards.

in every comparison

What stays the same.

Real framework code with a git history you can clone and take anywhere

Marketers edit text, links and images on the page itself

Agents are files in the repo: a goal, a schedule and permissions

Every run gets its own branch, a report, a preview and a diff

A person reviews and publishes. Nothing reaches the site on its own

Next.js, Astro, Svelte or React Router, with any coding agent

Server-rendered pages, so search and AI engines get real HTML

Free to start, usage based, never priced per seat

questions

Before you pick a page.

Yes. Content is stored in Fimo and edited on the page or through structured fields, like any headless CMS. The difference is scope: Fimo also has the site's code, so it hosts the site, previews changes before they go live and runs agents on it.

No. Claude Code, Cursor and Codex build the site. Fimo takes the site they produced and owns what comes after: editing, hosting, previews, publishing and the agents that keep the site current.

Once it exists as code. A site inside a builder has to be rebuilt first, as a Next.js, Astro, Svelte or React Router project, usually by a coding agent. Connecting that project takes minutes.

The one you are coming from. Choosing a CMS: Contentful or Storyblok. An agent built your site: Cursor. Weighing a builder: Framer, Lovable, Replit or Webflow.

Not day to day. Editing content, reviewing an agent's work and publishing happen in the interface. Bringing the site in and changing its design go through the chat or your coding agent.

Most tools in these categories charge per seat, per editor or per site. Fimo is free to start and metered on what you run, with Pro at $149 a month. Adding a teammate does not change the bill.
keep reading

Or start with the product.

What the agents actually doSEO, internal links, translations and content refresh, each on its own schedule.
Pricing, without the seatsFree to start, usage based, and what the Pro plan includes.

Fimo is free to start.

Bring the site your coding agent built and have an agent running before anyone asks for a budget.

Try Fimo for free